President Donald Trump Done Florida US daily newspaper in ‘The New York Times15 on Arab Dollar Of Defamation Case Record Done Was, which was rejected by the court. Trump Had alleged that this newspaper has been campaigning against him for decades. He alleged that in the US daily newspaper, he, his family, his businesses and his political movement are being targeted in a planned manner.

Trump violated federal rules: US court

News agency Roots According to the report of US Court judge Steven Maryade Done Trump Has given 28 days time for filing a revised complaint. They said that Donald Trump Done Federal The rules have been violated, for which they need to make a clear statement. The court said that Trump Have to tell that Newsbar Why shouldn’t you get relief?

Trump Many were written by two journalists in their complaint Article And the name of a book is given, this Article And book 2024 Election Before Publisher Was done Trump Said that this newspaper is one of the worst and falling newspapers in the history of our country and radical Leftist Democrat Party Virtual ,PalatialHas been made.

Donald Trump accused the newspaper of supporting Democratic rival Kamla Harris and claimed that his presence on the first page is the biggest illegal electoral contribution so far.,

Trump declares American newspaper fake

The US President held ‘The New York Times’ responsible for fake news, saying that we are taking action against fake news networks, as our cases filed earlier against George Slopadopolos/ABC/Disney and 60 minutes/CBS/Paramount were successful. These media institutions tried to tarnish them in a malicious manner by changing the documents and scenes and later had to compromise on the record amount. “

Also read: ‘I did not order the shooting, get investigated’, former PM Oli said on 72 deaths in GEN -Z demonstrations in Nepal

YouTube new rule: YouTube has made a big change in its livestreaming policy. Under this new rule, which comes into effect from July 22, now any person will be able to live from his channel only when he is at least 16 years old. Earlier this age limit was 13 years i.e. now YouTube creators between 13 to 15 years will have to seek the help of an adult to livestream.

What does the new rule say?

According to YouTube’s guideline, if someone is under 16 years of age and is ready for an adult livestream with him, he can become the editor, manager or owner of the adult channel. With this, the adult himself can start livestream from that YouTuber’s channel and can deliver content to the audience.

Now the trend of family livestreaming will increase

The direct effect of this change can be that now more and more families live together on YouTube. Now children under 16 years of age are not allowed to come live alone, so parents or parents will not only have to handle technical control but also monitor the children during the livestream. This can also create a new digital coordination between children and parents.

What are the benefits

If family members do livestroke together, it not only ensures safety of children but can also become a new digital way to spend time together. This change can be beneficial for families that use YouTube as a creative platform.

But the challenges are also no less

However, even though it may sound fun to listen to family livestrimping, there are many challenges associated with it. Being live means that everything is going in front of everyone immediately. In such a situation, the question of privacy arises. It is important to have a clear understanding between parents and children that what can be made public and who should be kept private. Also, it is important to keep in mind that the livestream remains interesting and not a violation of YouTube guidelines.

This new rule of YouTube will also help children to protect cyberbulling and unknown people from the loss in live chat. Experts believe that before such content, families should set their limits and respect each other’s privacy.

Also read:

Huawei introduced new EV battery technology! Full charge in just 5 minutes, range of up to 3,000 km

Nyt on pahalgam terror attack: The New York Times has once again come into controversy over the reporting of painful terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir. 26 innocent tourists were killed in this attack, after which the Government of India and security experts clearly termed it as a terrorist attack, but the New York Times described it in its report as “militant attacks, which led to disagreement by the Committee of Foreign Affairs of the lower house of the US Congress.

The committee publicly shared a picture on the social media platform ‘X’, in which the word “militant” was cut and “terrorist” was instead. The committee leader wrote, “New York Times, we have fixed it for you. It was a terrorist attack. When it comes to India or Israel, your attitude deviates from reality.”

India will take action against the culprits

India held a high -level security review meeting soon after this attack, in which Prime Minister Narendra Modi clearly called a terrorist attack and promised that strict action would be taken against the culprits. In the briefing given to the cabinet committee, it was revealed that Pakistan was behind the attack. This attack has been considered a conspiracy to derail the peaceful elections in Kashmir and the progress being made towards development. The Government of India has submitted evidence against organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba to Pakistan many times before, but no cooperation was found.

Hey, @nytimes We fixed it for you. This was a terrorist attack plain and simple.

Whether it’s India or israel, when it comes to terrrorism the nyt is removed from reality. pic.twitter.com/7pefekmtdq

– House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority (@houseforeigngop) April 23, 2025

Difference between extremism and terrorism

Extremism and terrorism are two different concepts, which need to be clearly understood. Extremism can be a form of disagreement and armed opposition within a nation, which demands political change. Whereas in terrorism, through a well planned violence, a nation is to destabilize and create fear in the general public. This may be associated with support and global agendas from border.