Ever since the trailer of the film ‘Udaipur Files’ was released, the film remains a part of controversies. Separate cases have been registered on the makers in many places. At the same time, this was heard in Delhi High Court today. In which, speaking on behalf of CBFC, ASG Chetan Sharma said, ‘You watch the film, it is not made on any particular community.

In Delhi High CourtHappened ,Udaipur files, on hearing

ASG Chetan Sharma further said, ‘The whole story of the film is that the seeds of communal disharmony are sown and spread across the border in a well -planned manner. Those statements of the community have also been included in this film that we all should live together. Yesterday, those people on the streets of Karachi, for whom Operation vermilion was run, again gathered under the patronage of ISIS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ugzqnmghmy

The court asked – what to do with the film,

Chetan Sharma also said, ‘The film cautions the people here and we all should support it together. If someone has any objection to this, then tell me nothing .. ‘Let me tell you that the Delhi High Court at 2.30 pm Chief Justice D.K. The bench of Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held this hearing. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal said that what I saw yesterday was frightening. The High Court Supreme Court did not give any clear order on stopping the screening.

Kapil Sibal had demanded only a listing in the Supreme Court, no hearing was held. The petitioners lodged a detailed objection to the film and the trailer. The court asked whether any order was really passed, give information on this subject. So Sibal said, ‘We have filed a detailed reply on it after watching the film yesterday. Sibal requested the High Court to make a detailed hearing of the matter and sought CBFC and the manufacturers on that affidavit.

Why did there be controversy over the story of the film,

In fact, the story of the film ‘Udaipur Files’ is based on the murder of Kanhaiyalal Sahu, the tailor of Udaipur, Gyanvapi Masjid dispute, and the controversial statement of Nupur Sharma. Therefore, Muslim organizations are strongly opposing this film. They allege that through this, Muslim society is being shown wrong. Seeing this, the atmosphere of the country can deteriorate.

Also read –

‘Internet is stressed’, neat raging on Jaya Bachchan’s statement, said – ‘Their whole family is toxic’

Controversy over the Vijay Raj starrer film ‘Udaipur files’ based on the famous Kanhaiya Lal Taylor murder case of Rajasthan is increasing. The demand to stop the release of this film is gaining momentum. Released on July 11, the film is facing strong criticism, Arshad Madni, President of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, had filed a petition demanding a ban on the film in the Delhi High Court. At the same time, Javed, accused in the murder case, has also filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding a ban on the release of the film. Let us know the whole matter here.

Why did Arshad Madani demand a ban on Udaipur files
Maulana Arshad Madani, president of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, has moved the Delhi High Court to stop the release of the film ‘Udaipur files’ based on the murder of tailor Kanhaiya Lal Sahu in Udaipur. Madani’s petition states that this film is “extremely inflammatory”, which can incite communal tension and spoil the public system.

It further states that its trailer also has the ability to incite communal tension and it presents a very divisive and inflammatory story. It has also been said that the film mentions the sensitive and under consideration of the Gyanvapi mosque, which is currently pending in the Varanasi district court and the Supreme Court, and the controversial statement of former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Nupur Sharma has been exaggerated. Madani’s petition has demanded the removal of the trailer and banned the film.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ugzqnmghmy

What happened in Delhi High Court?
A petition challenging the release of the film ‘Udaipur Files’ was heard in the Delhi High Court. Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay said in a strict tone that “no one’s religious feelings can be hurt in the name of freedom of expression.” At the same time, the counsel for the censor board told the court that all objectionable scenes have been removed from the film. However, on behalf of Maulana Arshad Madni, President of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that the film has scenes that can incite religious hatred and violate constitutional principles. He questioned whether the controversial content should be removed only on the trailer or on the whole film, and the assurance that nothing has been objectionable.

High court ordered a special screening of the film
In response, the Chief Justice directed that the entire film should be shown for the legal team of the petitioners. Filmmaker’s lawyer Chetan Sharma also requested the presence of a fair observer during the screening, but the Chief Justice insisted that the rights of the petitioners should be honored. He emphasized that constitutional instructions should be followed and freedom of expression should not be justified for humiliating any religious community.

Maulana Arshad Madani expressed saints on the stand of the courtShrink
After the proceedings, Maulana Arshad Madani expressed satisfaction over the court’s stand and said that the manufacturers and the censor board have admitted to removing the controversial scenes. He hoped that the final verdict of the court would maintain constitutional values ​​and protect the religious sentiments of Muslims regarding the release of the film. After the screening, the case will be re -considered and the next hearing will be held on 10 July.

What happened in the Supreme Court?
Let us know that Javed, one of the accused of killing Kanhaiya Lal, has said in his petition filed in the Supreme Court, demanding a ban on the film to be released on July 11, that its release will violate his right to hear a fair hearing. The petitioner claimed that the film shows a unilateral picture of the incidents of this heinous case in June 2022. He also argued that the accused have not been convicted yet.

Javed’s lawyer said, “It is releasing on Friday. They are only showing the side of the prosecution.” However, the apex court paid no attention to it and refused to stop the release of the film, which stars Kanhaiya Lal as Vijay Raj in the role of Kanhaiya Lal.

Also read:-Sitaare Zameen Par Box Office Collection Day 20: The third Wednesday decreased ‘Stars on the ground’, but the ‘Red 2’ is going to give it! Learn- Collection