On Wednesday (August 20, 2025) during the monsoon session of Parliament, Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced 3 bills, on which the opposition cut a huge uproar. On Thursday (21 August 2025), senior Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP P. Chidambaram also targeted the government. He has described these bills as extraordinary and clearly unconstitutional.

P Chidambaram posted on X and said that if a arrested Chief Minister does not get bail in 30 days, he will not remain the Chief Minister. Have you heard more strange things in the legal world. Senior advocate Chidambaram said that there is no allegation, no lawsuit, no conviction, but the decision of the public in the election will be overturned by a mere arrest (usually on fake charges).

The government introduced an extraordinary and patently unconstitutional bill in the Lok Sabha Yesterday

If an arrested Chief Minister does not get bail in 30 days, He will cease to be Chief Minister!

Have You Heard of Anything More Bizarre in the legal world?

No Charges, No…

– P. chidambaram (@pchidambaram_in) August 21, 2025

P Chidambaram raised many questions
The senior Congress leader said that nowadays the lower courts give less bail and the High Court is also ignoring it. He raised the question and said that thousands of bail petitions come in the Supreme Court every month. This process will take several weeks. Meanwhile, 30 days will pass and the elected government will become unstable. Can something more illegal, unconstitutional, anti-democracy and anti-federal?.

Amit Shah told why the bill was brought?
Amit Shah yesterday introduced a bill in the Lok Sabha amidst strong opposition from the opposition, which was later sent to the Joint Committee. It will include 21 members of Lok Sabha and 10 members of Rajya Sabha. Home Minister Shah has said that the purpose of bringing the law is to raise the falling moral standards and maintain honesty in politics.

Also read

The name of this railway station changed, Union Minister Jitendra Singh said thank PM Modi

The US Supreme Court on Friday (June 27, 2025) has given a major victory to the President by curbing the power of federal judges to prevent the executive actions of Donald Trump.

With a 6-3 decision regarding Trump’s attempt to end congenital citizenship, the court said that the nationwide prohibition issued by the judges of the District Court is more than the just rights given by the Congress to the federal courts.

According to the AFP report, the US Supreme Court did not immediately pronounce the decision on the constitutionality of Trump’s executive order seeking abolition of citizenship for children born on American soil, but in the realm of judicial matters, the decision will remove a major obstruction for Trump’s often highly controversial orders and will increase the power of the White House further.

What did Justice Amy Kony Barrett say?
Justice Amy Koni Barrett said that the federal courts do not normalize the executive branch, but they resolve matters and disputes according to the rights given to them by the Congress. He said that when a court concludes that the executive branch has worked illegally, it does not mean to encroach its power for the court.

Three other judges disagreed with this decision. This decision will have far -reaching consequences for the judiciary’s ability to rein in Trump or future American presidents. The case was clearly about the executive order signed by Trump on the first day of his term, in which the birthright was abolished.

Trump’s order is considered unconstitutional by the courts of three states
Trump’s birth -based citizenship order has been considered unconstitutional by Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington State Courts, due to which the President has made an emergency appeal in the Supreme Court to cancel the nationwide prohibition.

The issue has become a slogan of the rally for Trump and his Republic associates, who accuse the judiciary of disrupting their agenda against the wishes of the voters. During the debate before the Supreme Court in May, both conservative and liberal judges had expressed concern about the increasing use of nationwide prohibitory orders on behalf of the District Courts in recent years.

Also read:

‘Election Commission is secretly implementing NRC in Bihar’, Asaduddin Owaisi spoke on voter list controversy