India has appealed to the United Nations (UN) in Pakistan has been scolded in such a way that They Will never be able to forget. India described Pakistan as the home of global terrorism and said that Pakistan has always adopted a dual attitude on the issue of terrorism. The Indian representative strongly criticized linking terrorism in India with the freedom struggle. He said that Pakistan terrorist Brigades To freedom fighter Is telling.

of pakistan UN of mission counselor Muhammad Jawad Ajmal said at the UN that countries should distinguish between terrorism and the exercise of people’s right to resist foreign occupation. He claimed that those who attacked India freedom fighter were exercising their legitimate right to protest against foreign occupation.

Raghu Puri, First Secretary of India’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations, said on Ajmal’s comment that Pakistan’s double standards and hypocrisy everyone’s Has come to the fore. He said that terrorism is the biggest threat to humanity and countries like Pakistan and its supporters remain the biggest violators of human rights.

He said, ,Terrorism is one of the most serious crimes which fundamentally violates the core of humanity, This is the worst form of bigotry, violence, intolerance and fear., Raghu Puri reiterated that Pakistan is a terrorism center, whose wires worldwide He is linked to several terrorist attacks targeting innocent people.

Pakistani counselor Ajmal also tried to misinterpret international law. Ajmal falsely claimed that the distinction (between terrorism and freedom struggle) was based on international law, international humanitarian law and General Assembly resolution 46/51. In has been observed completely, which also supports this position.

The 1994 General Assembly Declaration clearly states that criminal acts intended or planned to incite terror among the general public, a group of people, or specific individuals for political purposes are unjustified under any circumstances, regardless of the political, philosophical, ideological, racialWhatever may be the views of racial, religious or any other nature.

The Assembly resolution 46/51 cited by Ajmal mentions the struggle for independence but does not legitimize terrorism anywhere and emphasizes that it unequivocally condemns all acts, methods and practices of terrorism as criminal and unjustified, no matter where or by whom they are committed.

The resolution demanded that all countries fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from participating in terrorist activities in other countries.