DA Hike News: After Bihar, Kerala and Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh government is also following the footsteps of the Centre. After the decision to increase the dearness allowance of central employees, state governments are also giving this gift to their employees. Now recently, employees of Uttar Pradesh have also got increase in dearness allowance. Due to which there is a very happy atmosphere among the employees.

How much did dearness allowance increase?
In fact, recently it has been announced that dearness allowance of government employees of Uttar Pradesh will be increased by 2 percent. After which now the dearness allowance of employees has increased from 58% to 60%. For this, ACS Finance Deepak Kumar of Uttar Pradesh has also issued orders.

Also read: Inspiring Story: This boy is rearing chickens after studying from IIT, earlier people used to make fun of him, today he earns more than Rs 1 crore every month.

How much take home salary will you get?
Even a small increase in dearness allowance of employees can be reflected in the take home salary. In such a situation, according to India Today, let us tell you through a table how much dearness allowance will increase for an employee with a basic salary of Rs 18,000 to Rs 2.5 lakh.

Basic salary (monthly)	How much amount will be added every month (approximately)	Increase (in percentage)
Rs 18,000	360 to 540 rupees	2%
Rs 29,200	584 to 876 rupees	2%
Rs 30,000	600 rupees	2%
Rs 56,100	Rs 1,122	2%
Rs 1,00,000	Rs 2,000	2%
Rs 2,50,000	5,000 to 7,500 rupees	2%

Also read: ATF Tax: Delhi, Mumbai reduced jet fuel tax! What impact could this have on airlines and tickets?

Let us tell you that as per the government order, this dearness allowance will be applicable from January 1. Pensioners will also get the benefit of this. This time this order of the government has been a little late, due to which there was a lot of commotion among the employees. Now the Central Government has also approved the implementation of the 8th pay scale. In such a situation, it is like double happiness for the employees.

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s birth anniversary festival was organized at Agra Fort in Agra, Uttar Pradesh. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and many ministers and leaders were present in the program. Yogi government was thanked for its cooperation in the grand program in Agra. Maharashtra government is also cooperating in the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Museum to be built in Agra.

As soon as the acquisition of land is completed, the work on Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Memorial will be started. Maharashtra Chief Minister thanked Yogi government for the cooperation of UP government for the memorial scheme.

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was imprisoned in Agra Fort

Aurangzeb had imprisoned Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in Agra Fort. The bravery story of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was resonating in the same fort where Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was imprisoned. After being released from prison, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj gave the slogan of Swaraj.

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that for seven decades the syllabus of NCERT books had 17 pages for the Mughal Empire and only one paragraph for the Maratha Empire. Devendra Fadnavis thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi who has given 20 pages to the Maratha Empire.

History of Mughals will not be taught – Devendra Fadnavis

He said that now the history of Mughals will not be taught in India. On the completion of 400 years of Shivaji Maharaj’s birth centenary in 2030, Modi ji will be brought to Agra Fort on Shiv Jayanti. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was like a ray of sun whom no one could stop.

The grave of the Marathas whom Aurangzeb came to Maharashtra to crush was built there. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was not a king but an idea. The process of constructing the memorial of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is going on in the final stage. Thanked Uttar Pradesh Government and Archeology Department for cooperation in the program.

Supreme Court on Bulldozer Action: The Supreme Court has reprimanded the UP government for bulldozer action. The apex court said that the victims should have given enough time before taking such action. This incident has shocked the ‘conscience of the court’. The court gave relief to the victims and gave conditional permission to rebuild the houses. The case is from Prayagraj, where in the year 2021, the houses of a lawyer, a professor and others were broken with bulldozers.

The bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh objected to the manner in which the victims were vandalized and termed it as arbitrariness of the state. The bench said, “The way this work was done within 24 hours of the notice, it has shook the conscience of the court.” The court gave the victims conditional permission to build a house at their expense, stating that they will have to give an affidavit that they will appeal on time, will not claim any land and will not include any third party. If their appeal is rejected, then they will have to break the houses again at their expense.

Notice at night and action next day: SC

The case is related to lawyer Zulfikar Haider, Professor Ali Ahmed, two widows and another person. He moved the Supreme Court after the petition was dismissed in the Allahabad High Court. They allege that the officials issued notices of demolition on Saturday night and broke their houses the next day. He did not get a chance to challenge this action. The victims say that the state government had linked their land to gangster Atik Ahmed.

Government bid- notice was given in 2020, 2021

India’s Attorney General R.K. Venkataramani defended the government’s decision, saying that the first notice was given to him on December 8, 2020. After this, notices were also given in January 2021 and March 2021. AG said, ‘Therefore we cannot say that the appropriate process was not followed. The entire process has been followed in this case.

Notices were not given in legal manner: court

The court said, ‘The state government should work impartially by giving appropriate time so that people can appeal. Notice was given on March 6 and bulldozer action took place on March 7. We allow them to rebuild the house. The bench also said that the notice was given by pasting the notice, which is not a legal way. Only the last notice was given legally.

‘The court cannot tolerate it’

The court, while giving the order, said, ‘We are going to pass the order in view of these facts, the way the whole process was done. The court cannot tolerate such a process. If we tolerate in one case then it will continue. We will pass the order that they can build a house at their expense and if the appeal is canceled, then they will have to break the house at their expense.