Politics in the country has been hot these days regarding the Waqf Amendment Bill. The government has announced that this bill will be introduced in the Lok Sabha on 2 April 2025. In such a situation, the politics of the country has also been hot on this bill. Let us tell you today what is the process of how the job is available in the Waqf Board?

Actually, jobs in Waqf Board are taken out for many posts. These jobs leave from the Central Government, the State Government or the concerned Waqf. Jobs on different sides are released on the board. These include the posts of administrative and other personnel including Junior Clerk, Legal Advisor, Inspector, Accounts Assistant.

Also read:

When recruitment comes out, its notification is released on the official website of the Waqf Board, the website of the state government or the employment portal. All information related to recruitment in notification is existed.

This is the necessary eligibility

Talking about educational qualification, it is according to the post. Which can also be 10th, 12th, graduation or post-graduation. Experience is also necessary for some big posts. Talking about age, this post should be between 18 years to 40 years. Whereas at the maximum age, there is relief under the government rule.

How is selection?

Talking about the selection, the selection of the candidate is done on the basis of written examination, interview, computer test, documents verification.

Also read:

Here is Master Planning to top CUET 2025 entrance! Learn what to do?

How to apply

Candidates have to visit the website of the concerned State Waqf Board. There, you can apply by checking details by clicking on the link related to recruitment in Jobs section. According to reports, the application process is like other government recruitment. For more details, candidates can take help of the official website.

Also read:

Education loan information:
Calculate Education Loan Emi

Waqf amendment bill in Lok Sabha , The Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 was introduced in the Lok Sabha today i.e. on Wednesday (April 2) by Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. As soon as the bill was introduced in the House, the opposition started protesting about it. Meanwhile, MP Ravi Shankar Prasad told about the benefits of the Muslim community with the Waqf Amendment Bill in the House. He took the names of Shah Bano, Saira Bano to Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, Veer Abdul Hameed, Mohammad Shami and Sonia Mirza during the discussion.

He said that remember the decision of the Supreme Court in Shahbano’s case was made. At that time Rajiv Gandhi was the Prime Minister of this country. Only a few rupees were given to that Muslim woman, what happened. At that time Arif Mohammad Khan was a minister in your government. His two days had a historic speech in the house that the decision of the Supreme Court is good. There was a sudden uproar Rajiv Gandhi was shaken. He was silenced. After Shahbano, Saira Bano was so much troublesome due to triple talaq, Muslim women had gone to the court. For two years, his government did not even file an answer in the Supreme Court, so that the matter remains hanging. Our government came in 2014. Modi ji made me a law minister. When the file came, he said that it has to be answered, the Supreme Court has scolded. I went to the Prime Minister, he said that go and stand outside the court that the Modi government is standing with Muslim women on triple talaq.

Every section of the community will benefit from the bill

MP Ravi Shankar Prasad said to the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 in the Lok Sabha, “Section 15 of the Constitution has written that there will be no discrimination of women. At the same time, through this bill, all the backward classes of the Muslim community will also benefit from it. Those who we call Pasmanda Samaj, they did not get anything in the first Waqf. But now they will have any place through this bill.

He said, “If the land of Waqf is being grabbed, then something will have to be done and Waqf is not a religious institution, so if this law will have something good for the people of Jamaat today, then what is the problem.”

MP mentioned Section 25 of the Constitution

Speaking in the House, Ravi Shankar Prasad also mentioned section 25 of the Constitution. He said, “If the land of Waqf is being ruined or it is being looted, then Section 25 of the Constitution gives the right that a law can be made for this.”

370 and Caa Also mentioned

Ravi Shankar Prasad also mentioned Section 370 and CAA. He said, “From the heart these people also want something to be good, but politics is pulling them back. There was a similar opposition during Section 370, but see what is the atmosphere today. Today the tricolor is waving at Lal Chowk.

Apart from this, the same happened against CAA. After all, how far will this country go for vote bank, but now all this will not work. “

Target against opposition for majority

Ravi Shankar said about the majority on the opposition, “He has not received a majority even once after Rajiv Gandhi.” He lashed out at Akhilesh Yadav and said, “Akhilesh ji, understand, you see how many times Modi ji has got a majority. See now it is Bihar’s turn. The people of Krishachan community are also in support of it and there are many Christians in Uttar Pradesh. You are understanding.”

He said, “The Modi government says that everyone should develop with everyone. It is not that if you do not vote, then your road will not be built here. We want to develop the whole country.”

Waqf amendment bill in Lok Sabha: Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday introduced the Waqf Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha. Starting the discussion on the bill, Kiren Rijiju said, ‘A total of 97,27,772 petitions have been received as online, memorandum, request and suggestion. 284 delegation spoke before the committee and gave suggestions. The government has considered all of them carefully, whether they are through JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee) or a memorandum given directly.

He further said, ‘Never before has any bill in history has received such a large number of petitions. Many legal experts, community leaders, religious leaders and others gave their suggestions before the committee. Last time, when we introduced the bill, I still told many things. I do not expect, but sure those who were opposing it will change their heart and they will support the bill. I want to say the mind of the mind, no one should consider anyone’s point that the pain of the land should never be considered as auspicious.

‘Waqf also claimed Parliament’

During the discussion, Kiren Rijiju said, ‘In the year 2013, the UPA government gave the Waqf Board the right that the order of the Waqf Board cannot be challenged in any civil court. Had the UPA government been in power, it was not known how many buildings including Parliament building, airport would have been declared Waqf property. In the year 2013, I was very surprised how it was forcibly passed.

He said, ‘After the provision of the Waqf Act in 2013, a case was going on in Delhi since 1977, including several properties including the CGO Complex and Parliament House. The Delhi Waqf Board claimed to have Waqf property on them. The matter was in the court, but at that time the UPA government denotified all the land and handed over to the Waqf Board. If we had not introduced this amendment today, then the Parliament House where we are sitting in it could have been claimed to have Waqf property.

‘Earlier Waqf was invalled’

He said, ‘Someone said that these provisions are non -constitutional. Someone said that they are illegal. This is not a new subject. The bill was passed for the first time before independence. Earlier, Waqf was an invalidate (illegal agreement). The Muslim Waqf Act was brought in 1923. The Act was passed on giving the basis of transparency and accountability.

He further said, ‘For the first time in 1995, the provision of Waqf Tribunal was made. Due to this, a person dissatisfied with any decision taken by the Waqf Board could challenge him in the Waqf Tribunal. This was the first time such a system was established. At that time it was also decided that if there is an income of more than 5 lakh rupees from a Waqf property, then the government would appoint an executive officer for its monitoring. This system was also started in 1995 itself. Why is this issue catching so much today? ‘