All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaduddin Owaisi has fiercely attacked the Modi government at the Centre. Addressing an election rally held in Sangireddy district, he termed the new Waqf (Amendment) Bill as a ‘law that will destroy Muslims’ and claimed that if his party had more MPs in Parliament, the government would not have had the courage to bring it. While expressing his views, Owaisi also gave a befitting reply to those who raised questions on patriotism.

In the speech, Owaisi said, ‘If Akhtarul Iman and Imtiaz Jalil had come to the Parliament of India along with Asaduddin Owaisi, there were three of us, then perhaps Narendra Modi could not have brought this black Waqf law.’ He asked in a questioning tone, who is being harmed by making this law? He clarified that there is a danger of damage only to the mosques, dargahs and khanqahs of Muslims.

Owaisi expressed concern over intolerance

Expressing concern over the increasing intolerance in the country, Owaisi said that there is no need to despair over mob lynching and atrocities committed by cow vigilantes. Referring to the incidents of damage to mosques in Tripura, he said that we have to keep our morale high and face the situation in a democratic manner.

Mentioned about the victory in Nagpur

Citing the growing strength of his party in Maharashtra, Owaisi said that when 125 corporators were successful in the Majlis, the opposition parties got worried. Referring to the victory in Nagpur, he said that where BJP’s headquarters is located and where they are called ‘B Team’, 6 councilors of Majlis have shown their strength by winning. He said, “We had raised the flag and told, listen RSS people, this is the Majlis, now it has come here and will become stronger in Nagpur.”

Owaisi’s strong reaction against opponents

Owaisi gave a strong reaction when his opponents called him anti-national. He said that people associate him with the person who created Pakistan (Jinnah), but it is not so. He said, ‘I am not the one who divided India and went to Pakistan. I love this country and will always love it. He clarified that his fight is not against the country, but against those forces who snatch the rights of Muslims and Dalits.

Also read: Trade deal between India and America, these 5 things changed overnight due to one phone call of Modi-Trump

Supreme court hearing on waqf act: On Tuesday (May 20, 2025), several petitions challenged the new Waqf Act were heard in the Supreme Court. During this, CJI BR Gawai, while referring to a temple in Khajuraho, said that the temple is under the patronage of the Archaeological Department and still people can go and worship there. On this, Kapil Sibal argued that the new law says that if this ASI is a protected area then it cannot be a waqf.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta put the side of the government in front of the bench of CJI BR Gawai and Justice AG Christ. He said that in the beginning three points were fixed. We responded to three, but the parties have also mentioned different issues from these three issues. I think the court should focus on just three issues. However, Kapil Sibal opposed the Solicitor General and said that we will argue on all issues.

What did Kapil Sibal say while arguing?

Kapil Sibal, while arguing, said that in the last hearing it was said that if the interim order needs to be issued, the court will issue. On this, SG Tushar Mehta read the previous order before the court. The Solicitor General, while reading the order, said that the government has given undertaking that the role of the board members, the role of Waqf by user and DM was talked about. These were the three issues on which the government gave undertaking.

On this matter of Solicitor General, Sibal said that hearing should be held on issuing interim order in this matter. On this, it was said by the Supreme Court that the hearing of the case should be carried forward.

‘These institutions run with charity’

Sibal said that it is illegal and is going to take away the control of Waqf property. The property to be vowed will be investigated with the possibility of any dispute. The collector will investigate and the collector is a government man. In such a situation, there is no time limit for investigation. Until the report comes, the property cannot be wakf. Whereas property is given in the name of Allah. Once it was done, it was done forever. The government cannot provide financial help in it. Sibal further said that there is no offering in mosques like temples. These institutions run with charity.

On this, the court asked that there is a climb in the dargahs. Sibal said that I am talking about mosques, the dargah is different. He said that there is a offering in temples, but not in mosques and this is ‘Waqf by user’. The Babri Masjid was also like this. There were different provisions from 1923 to 1954, but the basic principles were the same.

Sibal further said, “The new law says that as soon as any building is declared an ancient protected monument under the ASI Act, the right to Waqf will be eliminated. The new law provides that a person adopting Islam through conversion can not make the Waqf Waqf before 5 years. This provision is completely unconstitutional. This provision is completely unconstitutional. Earlier people were selected and all Muslims were rejected. Now can be non -Muslims. “

When Khajuraho was mentioned during the hearing

On this, the CJI said that there is a temple in Khajuraho under the patronage of the Archaeological Department, yet people can go there and worship. On this, Sibal argued that the new law says that if this ASI is a protected area then it cannot be a waqf.

The bench asked if it takes away your right to follow religion? Can you not go there and pray? Sibal said that yes, it states that the declaration of Waqf property is zero. If it is zero then how can I go there? The CJI further said, “I visited the temple, which is under ASI, but devotees can go and worship there. So does such an announcement take away your right to worship?”

Sibal said that if you say that Waqf is zero then it is no longer Waqf. I say that this provision violates Article 25. There is no judicial process and then you force Waqf to go to court and challenge the collector’s decision and as long as the decision comes, the property is no longer the Waqf.

Also read: ‘There is no offering here like temples’, CJI Gavai said on Kapil Sibal’s argument but I have seen in the dargahs …

Asaduddin Owaisi on Waqf Law: All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) Chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who was seen standing with the Government of India over Operation Sindoor, was agitated on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the Waqf Act. He said that the Waqf law is against Muslims and it will have to be withdrawn. He also said that Pakistan has made us groom brother. We are also giving them the message that we are talking about our house.

He said, “The Prime Minister repeatedly says in his speech that Abdul makes puncture. So choose Waji-e-Azam Abdul puncture, but he does not capture a yatimkhana like your friend Mukesh who your friend did in Mumbai. Abdul makes his house but he does not make his house on someone’s land. The Prime Minister says that the Prime Minister is poor. So Abdul is poor. Going. “

‘Not even a Muslim minister in your cabinet’

AIMIM Chief further said, “You have abolished Maulana Azad Falosif so that no Muslim children can do PhD and MPhil. Then the Prime Minister says that in this law we are involving Pasmanda Muslims, let’s listen to you but do not believe. Let us also tell us that you do not have a Muslim minister. When he should not have any discrimination with anyone, when you do not have any discrimination, then there is no discrimination in India. If you believe, then put it again. “

‘If Muslims of India want, they will have to withdraw the law’

He said, “If the Muslims of India will decide the day they will not leave the ground. Either the law will go or if we go inside this land, then they will have to withdraw this law. We have to understand our responsibilities and fulfill it. There is no need to fear and panic. We have to do this work by staying within the purview of law. Chandrababu Naidu also cheated very much.”

Also read: ‘Already 140 crore population burden, not Bharat Dharamshala’, Sri Lankan Tamil sought refuge and provoked Supreme Court

Review is going on in the Supreme Court regarding the Waqf Amendment Act 2025. But the remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey about the judiciary on Saturday remains the subject of controversy. Nishikant Dubey said that the Supreme Court is going out of its limits and listening to the decision. He is ignoring the Parliament of the country. He also said that the only purpose of the country’s court is to show the face, I will tell the law. If the Supreme Court has to give a decision in all cases, then Parliament and Legislative Assembly should be closed. Apart from this, he has said many other things.

In such a case, it is necessary to know that if rhetoric is made against the Supreme Court, then how can one get a punishment in such a case.

Rhetoric against Supreme Court by staying in limits

The answer is yes, rhetoric can be made against the Supreme Court, but there are some limitations about it. Under Article 19 of the Constitution, every citizen has gained freedom of expression, but this freedom is not complete. For example, inflammatory speech or derogatory rhetoric cannot be made. It is legally banned and legal action can also be taken regarding this. The Constitution of India gives people freedom of expression, including rhetoric on the decision of the Supreme Court.

Legal action can be taken

However, people do not get this freedom completely, because some restrictions have been imposed in Article 19 (2) of the Constitution. Legal action can be taken against him if a person makes inflammatory statements against the Supreme Court or if he provokes a public system or provokes people against a particular community. Action can also be taken against the Supreme Court on making derogatory statements. Especially when the court is contempt or is damaging the reputation of the judges.

Criticizing the decision of the Supreme Court is a democratic right, but criticism should be appropriate and creative. If that criticism is derogatory, false or provocative, then it can be punished for it.

Also read: Can polio spread from Pakistan to India, know where this virus is present in the world now?

Asaduddin Owaisi Attack on PM: Asaduddin Owaisi has called the Waqf Amendment Bill an attack on the land and identity of Muslims. Taking a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he said that planned attacks are being carried out on Muslims for the last 11 years. He alleged that the Modi government is snatching the land and mosques of Muslims. Bulldozer politics is targeting Muslim areas.

Owaisi said, “Narendra Modi considers himself bigger than Babasaheb Ambedkar, but he is not even dust of his leg.” He appealed to the people to mobilize against the Waqf Bill and said that this is a long battle and it will have to be withdrawn on the lines of agricultural laws. The thing that is the owner of Allah, today Modi is saying that its owner is not Allah. “Owaisi said in his speech that Waqf property is related to religious faith. Some kind of government occupation is against the constitution and religious freedom.

Hearted response to BJP MP Nishikant Dubey
The AIMIM chief called upon his supporters to unite and launch the movement in support of the decision of the Muslim Personal Law Board. He said that just as farmers fought a long battle against agricultural laws, similarly Muslims will also have to raise their voice against this law. Owaisi also reacted sharply to the statement of BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, in which he had commented on the Supreme Court. He said, “BJP leaders are now threatening the Supreme Court. It is clear that the government does not accept the constitution nor the judiciary.”

Modi government is doing politics of hate in the country- AIMIM
The AIMIM chief also said that the Modi government is doing politics of hatred and partition in the country. He said, “The beauty of India is its brotherhood, not Modi. If this Waqf Amendment Act is implemented, it will harm India’s common heritage.”

Bihar News: Spiritual Guru Devkinandan Thakur has received a response to the violence against Waqf Amendment Act in West Bengal. During a conversation with the media in Buxar on Tuesday (April 14), he said, “Whether it is Akhilesh, Dinesh, whether there is any Mamta, no one is taking anyone’s name, I am just saying that the condition with which the fire has come from Bangladesh to Bengal, bean style is being tortured. The same fire will be the same if the fire will move slowly.”

Attacking politicians, he said, “Do not talk about Hindus, talk about castes. I believe that rise above castes, rise above chairs and keep a huge thinking. Try to save India.”

Thanks to PM Modi and Amit Shah

Devkinandan Thakur thanked PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for the Waqf law. Said, “Amit Shah fought the fight till 2 o’clock in the night. They have fought for the countrymen. There is no such law. There is no such law in the Muslim country. The property of poor poor widow Muslim women was also grabbed. This will not work in this country.”

Devkinandan Thakur said, “When King Bali had donated the entire universe to the Lord Vamana, then who are you going to donate to the Waqf Board? In two verses, Vamana God measured the whole universe, then the whole land was done by Vamana.

‘Buxar has different names in all four ages’

On the other hand, Devkinandan Thakur said about the importance of Buxar that it has different names in all four ages. Whether it is Siddhashram, whether it is a Vamana place, it has a different significance in every era. He said that Lord Shri Ram should have so much light that people from India and abroad keep coming here. The Bihar government should make an airport here.

Also read: Lalan Singh’s ultimatum to MLAs and ticket contenders before PM Modi’s visit to Bihar, ‘If in the meeting…’

Khilafat majlis protest: The Yunus government of Bangladesh is not backing down from doing activities against India. After the violence on Hindus there, now fundamentalists of Bangladesh are opposing the Waqf law of India. “Khilafat Majlis”, an Islamic fundamentalist organization in Bangladesh, has threatened to protest against the Indian High Commission in Dhaka.

The organization has said that on April 23, their workers will hold a public meeting in front of the Indian High Commission and will raise their voice against the Waqf law. Along with this, they will also submit a memorandum to the officials of the High Commission.

Maulana Mamunul Haq said this in his statement

The party’s rich Maulana Mamunul Haq said that the BJP government in India has been targeting Muslims for a long time. He has left his radical Hindu supporters on Muslims. During this time, the land of Muslims is being forcibly captured. Temples and other buildings are being built there by snatching the properties of their private and Waqf.

He said that even after this his greed did not end. Now the Waqf Amendment Bill of 2025 has been passed, which has given legal approval to these land occupations. We have already expressed our opposition and displeasure against these decisions. Muslims of India are protesting against this law. This bill interferes with the religious rights and rules of Muslims. Maulana Mamunul Haq said that the entire Muslim world should raise voice on the violence against Muslims in India.

‘The issue should be raised on international forums’

He said that the government of India and some media there are repeatedly propagating that minorities are being tortured in Bangladesh. In fact, due to the silence and indifference of the Bangladesh government about the violence on Muslims in India, India gets a chance to spread wrong information.

He said that the Bangladesh government should express its concern against the killing and atrocities of Muslims in India and oppose it. Also raised this issue vigorously in international forums such as the United Nations.

Relationship between India and Bangladesh is not better

In August last year, when the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina resigned and the interim government was formed under the leadership of Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohammad Yunus, since then activities against India in Bangladesh have increased significantly. There have been many incidents of violence against Hindus in Bangladesh in the last eight months. Along with this, many protests have also been seen against BSF near the Indo-Bangladesh border.

Mohammad Yunus has started strengthening relations with anti -India countries China and Pakistan. He also made a controversial statement about the north-eastern states of India in Beijing, the capital of China, on which Prime Minister Narendra Modi advised him to speak thoughtfully during the BIMSTEC conference in Bangkok recently. At the same time, former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina accused Mohammad Yunus of pushing the country towards terrorism.

Bhopal protest against waqf act: In Madhya Pradesh’s capital Bhopal on Thursday, the Muslim society unitedly demonstrated in protest against the Waqf Amendment Bill (Waqf Act). This strike was organized under the leadership of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, in which a large number of people participated.

The protesters, wearing black clothes and lodged a peaceful protest in front of the Central Library from 2 pm to 4 pm. During this time he neither raised any political flag nor supported any particular party.

Opposition to law, hope of justice
Congress MLA Arif Masood, who is leading the demonstration, made serious allegations against the government and said that this bill is not an attempt to protect Waqf properties, but to grab them. He said, “This law does not protect Waqf, but has been brought with the intention of freeing the assets of the government. This will not benefit the Waqf Board. We will not accept it under any circumstances.”

Arif Masood also clarified that the demonstration will not be limited to the roads only, but will be taken to the Supreme Court. He expressed confidence that the judiciary would intervene in the matter and provide justice to the Muslim society.

BJP’s response: ‘selfish -based movement’
On the other hand, BJP leaders have described this protest as ‘selfish based’. He says that this amendment has been brought with the aim of ensuring correct use of Waqf properties and rein in corruption. He claimed that this would really benefit poor Muslims, not some selected people who control Waqf properties.

Preparation for nationwide movement
This demonstration of Bhopal is part of the “Waqf Bachao Campaign”, which has been started by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. This campaign will be run across the country by 7 July. Board spokespersons said that this movement will be spread by village and city and city like Shah Bano case, so that more and more people can understand the impact of this law and raise their voice against it.

Protests happening in many cities
Protests are also being held in cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Patna, Hyderabad regarding the Waqf Amendment Bill. Muslim organizations say that the government is targeting religious and social institutions of minority society. The protesters consider it a violation of Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which gives the right to religious freedom and religious institutions.

The increasing protest against the Waqf Amendment Bill indicates that this issue is not only legal, but also socially and religious. While the government is calling it a step taken in transparency and the interest of the poor, Muslim organizations believe that it is hurting the sovereignty of Waqf and their religious freedom. In the coming days, there is a possibility of increasing a stir in the politics and courts of the country on this issue.

Pakistan on Waqf amendment bill: Recently, the Waqf Amendment Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha, which has now taken the form of the law after the President’s approval. The purpose of this law is to digitize Waqf properties, ban illegal encroachments and to fix accountability of Waqf boards.

This bill was in controversies in India, but more interesting response has come from Pakistan. Qamar Cheema, who is generally criticized for Indian policies, is considered to be Pakistan’s leading political analyst and security affairs experts, he publicly appreciated this law. He said that India’s decision regarding Waqf is correct. Qamar Cheema further said that as an example, people keep the dargah illegally occupied, so it is necessary to control such things. Such a situation is also in Pakistan, where people occupy mosques. I think the dargah people think that we should do our own work. The people of the dargah live in Pakistan and do corruption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw43cnfg8cs

Qamar Cheema supported the government
Qamar Cheema said that what the Modi government is doing is not wrong. He said that digitization of Waqf properties is an essential and positive step. The provisions that have been brought to prevent illegal encroachment are necessary. Transparency is necessary in the operation of mosques and dargahs so that their misuse can be stopped. He also said that the Muslim community itself should come forward and support these reforms as it is in the long -term interest of the society. He said that everyone should focus on reforms. My question is if the Waqf people are unable to improve for so many days, then whose mistake is. Therefore, reform is necessary.

Waqf mafia and corruption
Qamar Cheema also justified the word ‘Waqf Mafia’. He believed that 50,000 Waqf properties are going on in India, which is shocking. All these lands are inside UP. Many people of these institutions run their own arbitrary and want to avoid government monitoring. Waqf institutions are not ready for their internal reforms, due to which their purpose is becoming deformed. Giving the example of Pakistan, he said that all the efforts are made to protect religious institutions from government monitoring there so that economic transparency can be avoided.

Waqf law: There is a ruckus on the new law regarding Waqf. On Monday (April 7), there was a huge uproar in the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly. Where an MLA tore his court and waved in the air. Meanwhile, former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) President Mehbooba Mufti targeted Chief Minister Omar Abdullah.

Mufti said, “It is very disappointing that the Speaker of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly (Abdul Rahim Rather) has rejected the proposal on the Waqf Bill. Despite obtaining a strong mandate, the government has completely bowed to the BJP’s anti -Muslim agenda. She is trying to please both sides. ”

He said, “The National Conference (NC) can learn from the government of Tamil Nadu, which has strongly opposed the Waqf Bill. Jammu and Kashmir is the only Muslim-dominated region, so it is worrying that the alleged public-centric government does not even have the courage to debate this important issue. ”

It’s profoundly disappointing that speaker j & k association has rejected the motion on the waqf bill. Despite Securing a strong mandate, the government appears to have complete yielded to the BJP’s anti-muslim ageda, cynically attempting to appease both sides. The national…

– Mehbooba Mufti (@Mehboobamufti) April 7, 2025

In the assembly, Omar Abdullah’s party NC and Congress demanded a discussion against the Waqf law. National Conference MLA Nazir Ahmed Gureji said that this is the issue of our religion and it should be debated. This law is an attack on our mosques and if there is no debate on it, they will not let the house go.

During this time, BJP MLAs will not raise slogans of anti -national agenda. National Conference MLA Abdul Majeed Local tore his black coat in Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly. At the same time, many MLAs were seen throwing paper and throwing them.

After the approval of the Waqf Amendment Bill from the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, the President approved it on 5 April. Now it has taken the form of law.