On Thursday (April 17), the country’s largest court was heard in the Supreme Court regarding the Waqf law. The court said that there is no new appointment in the Waqf Board or Council. Along with this, the Supreme Court said that Waqf declared assets and registered assets should be allowed to remain as before. On this, the reaction of Aam Aadmi Party MLA and former Delhi Waqf Board Chairman Amanatullah Khan has come out. What he said will make those who oppose this law happy!

I wholeheartedly thank the Supreme Court- Amanatullah Khan

Amanatullah Khan said, “I am thankful to the Supreme Court wholeheartedly. All the judges of the Supreme Court, all the lawyers who got up above religion and worked hard for us. Use has been used. She will remain like mosques, dargahs and cemeteries.

#Watch Delhi: on the sc observations after hearing the petitions challenging the waqf amendment act, aap leader Amanatullah Khan Says, “I am Thankful to the Supreme Court, Judges and Advocates who Rose Above Religion and Helped us in protecting our country. pic.twitter.com/h1nqplmlvy

– ANI (@ani) April 17, 2025

How can DM be at the top- you MLA

Seven days time has been sought by the government, on this you MLA Amanatullah Khan said, “They will file an answer in seven days. After that we have been given five days.” On the role of DM, he said, “How can DM be at the top. It is to move. It is 100 percent that it will be removed. The Waqf Board will remain the same as it was.”

‘It happened as we wanted’

The AAP MLA said, “As we wanted, I have been connected with Waqf, I have been the chairman, so I know all its nuances. Where can we weaken, so we are completely free from this decision.” Please tell that the next hearing in this case will be held on 5 May.

Supreme Court on Waqf Act: A bench of Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan heard the Waqf Act on Wednesday (16 April 2025). At present, the court has not given any order or instruction in this case. During the hearing, the court asked the Center whether Muslims would be allowed to be part of Hindu religious trusts?

‘Waqf by user can have serious consequences’

Senior advocates on behalf of the Solicitor General of the Central Government and the supporters of the Act assured the Supreme Court that the amendments made in the Waqf Act are completely constitutional and there is nothing to violate fundamental rights. During the hearing, the Supreme Court also told the Center that the abolition of Waqf by user can have serious consequences. However, the court said that it has also been misused.

How to register Waqf by user- Supreme Court

Questioning the removal of the provision of Waqf Bai user, the bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna asked that there was no arrangement of Waqf registration before the British rule. The court said, “A lot of mosques are made up of 13th, 14th, 15th century. You want you to show the sed deed, but where will they show.

You cannot write the past again- Supreme Court

Tushar Mehta said that a large section of Muslims does not want to be ruled under the Waqf Act. The bench then asked Mehta, “Are you saying that from now on, you will allow Muslims to be part of the Hindu Entrance Board.” Say it openly. ”The Supreme Court said that when a public trust was declared a Waqf 100 or 200 years ago, it could not be taken under the Waqf Board and could not be declared otherwise. The bench said, “You cannot write the past again.”

Also read: WAQF Act: ‘Will there be Muslims in Hindu board too, speak openly’, why did the Supreme Court refer to Tirumala Tirupati Balaji and asked SG Mehta?