The Supreme Court will order on Monday (September 15, 2025) on the Waqf Amendment Act case. The court reserved the order on 22 May on the issue of interim relief in the case. The bench of Chief Justice BR Gawai and Augustin George Christ heard for 3 consecutive days.

During the hearing, the court had told the petitioners that the law made from Parliament is considered constitutional till the final decision is taken. A very strong base will be required to stop its provisions.

Opposition to things like preventing Waqf Board from claiming

The petitioner side has opposed things such as making the registration of Waqf by user mandatory, in the dispute of the Waqf Board with the government, to be in the hands of a government official, to make non -Muslims members members in the Waqf Board, the possibility of religious activity in ancient monuments, the condition of being a Muslim for 5 years and the Waqf Board on the tribal land to stop the Waqf Board. They have been described as discrimination from Muslims and interference in religious matters.

On the other hand, the Central Government cited the law to enact a law after following the entire process on behalf of Parliament. The Center said that it would not be right to stop the sections of the law before the final hearing. Those who have brought the petition here are not personally affected. He is not a representative of the entire Muslim community. The law has been made in public interest. The discrepancies of the old Waqf law have been removed.

This condition placed for waqf

The government said that Waqf is not an essential part of Islam. It cannot be given the status like fundamental rights. The registration of Waqf by user was also kept necessary in the 1923 law. People who have not registered for 102 years, are still protesting. If the property is not their, then it should be used in social interest.

The Center also argued that earlier only Muslims could do Waqf, but in 2013, the provision of the property of non -Muslims was also made. To improve this, a condition has been laid for at least 5 years to be a Muslim. Constitution also gives protection to the land of tribals.

Indication of prohibiting law provisions

Limited members in the Waqf Board will be non -Muslims, whose role will also be very limited. There will be no difference from new Waqf law on religious activities in ancient monuments. It should be noted that during the initial hearing of the case, the bench headed by the then Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna had indicated to stop some provisions of the law, but on April 17, the central government itself assured the court that there would be no appointment in the Waqf Board or Waqf Council at present.

Also, registered or declared Waqf by user (Waqf) properties will not be denotified. Now the order of the court will decide whether the Waqf Amendment Act will be fully applicable or not.

Also read:- Employee provoked with being fired from job in Hyderabad

Conference of Jamiat Ulema-E-HIND: In view of the current political background of the country, a two-day important delegation conference is scheduled to start in New Delhi on 3 and 4 May with a meeting of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind’s Working Committee (Working Committee). This meeting will be held tomorrow (May 3, 2025) at 11 am at the headquarters of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind under the chairmanship of Chairman Maulana Syed Arshad Madni. At the same time, after this conference, Maulana Arshad Madni will also address the press conference, President of Jamiat Ulema -e -Hind.

The president, general secretary, responsible and other representatives of all the states of the country are participating in this meeting. The important agenda of this conference includes legal conflict over the Waqf law, terrorist attack in Pahalgam, increasing hatred and tension in the country, protecting the constitution and by the Supreme Court guidelines, and by taking bulldozers on the foundation of religion on the foundation of religion.

The battle for the constitution and freedom of the country was important role

A statement has been issued by Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind. In the statement, Jamiat said, “Our country is a democratic country where people who believe in different religions have lived with patriotism and unity. The biggest reason for this is our constitution and it is also a historical truth that after the country got independence from slavery, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has played an important role in the construction of Constitution. Is a bright chapter.

,Jamiat considers the principle of unity in diversity,

In order to defeat the increasing hatred and communalism in the country, strengthen secularism and to make the protecting the constitution and democracy sure, the struggle at every level considers Ulema-e-Hind its duty. Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind not only considers the principle of diversity in unity and unity in diversity, but has risen above religion and has been repeatedly proving the help and guidance of people on the foundation of humanity.

Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind considers hate and communalism as a big threat to the unity and security of the country. Peace, unity and tolerance have been the bright tradition of this country, but now some forces are bent on ending this tradition in the arrogance of power. He loves power and political selfishness than the unity of the country.

There is no place of terrorism in Islam- Maulana Arshad Madani

Terrorism near Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, irrespective of it, is a very condemnable and unacceptable work. After the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Maulana Arshad Madni, president of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, said in his statement, “There is no place of terrorism in Islam and those who do so cannot be called humans. The killing of innocents is not justified in any religion and the murder of an innocent in Islam is said to be equal to the murder of the entire humanity.”

However, after this incident, the way the media of the country made a dangerous conspiracy to give it a religious color, its Maulana Madani strongly condemned and said that regardless of his life during the attack, the local people rose above religion and saved the tourists from the terrorists and brought the wounds on their back to the hospital, it is worthy of praise. This is a living evidence that the people of Kashmir are against terrorism and are supporters of peace and unity.

Consideration will be done in the conference on the situation created after the terrorist attack

In the conference, this terrorist attack and the situation arising the afternoon will be seriously discussed. The information about the new Waqf law, which is constantly coming to the media, who is struggling with the people and legal struggle, keeps coming in the media. Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind considers this law to be direct interference in unconstitutional and religious matters. He believes that this law cannot protect Waqf, but if this law is implemented then the Waqf properties of Muslims will be destroyed across the country.

The first writ petition against the Waqf law in the Supreme Court is the first- Madni

After the signature of His Majesty President, the first writ petition against this law was filed by Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind in the Supreme Court. Among the five petitions to be heard on May 5, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind’s petition is at number one. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal will appear for the advocate of the Waqf law towards Maulana Arshad Madni, president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind. During the conference, various aspects of the Waqf Act and the legal battle of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind will be discussed in detail. Apart from this, other important issues will also come under discussion and further strategy will be decided.

West bengal CM mamata bnerjee: Many other areas including Murshidabad in West Bengal have seen a lot of violence in the past. Now West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has appealed to people for peace. The Chief Minister released an official statement on Saturday (April 19, 2025). He appealed to improve the situation in the state and maintain law and order. Apart from this, he has held BJP and RSS responsible for inciting violence in the state in his statement.

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said, “BJP and its allies have suddenly become very aggressive in West Bengal. These allies also include the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). I did not name the RSS earlier, but now I am forced to identify them.” He said, “These forces are using the background of an unfortunate event as provocation. They are using this background for divisive politics. They want to play the game of ‘divide and rule’. In such a situation, I appeal to you, please be calm.”

We are taking action on the criminal behind riots – Chief Minister

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said, “We condemn communal riots and it is necessary to stop them. Strict action is being taken against those who are behind the riots, but we should avoid mutual mistrust and doubts. Major and minority communities should take care of each other.”

West Bengal CM Mamata Bnerjee appeals for peace in the state.

She says, “BJP and Its allies have suddenly become aligned in west Bengal. These allies include RSS … these forces are using the backdrop of an unfortunate if Are… pic.twitter.com/zcz77v1v11

– ANI (@ani) April 19, 2025

CM accused BJP and RSS

The Chief Minister accused the BJP and the RSS, saying, “They want to incite riots in the state and the riots affect everyone. We love everyone. We want to be together. We condemn the riots. We are against the riots. They want to divide us, only for tight electoral benefits. We have taken strict steps to maintain law and order and protect human life and dignity. Further action is being taken. “

Supreme Court Judgement on New Waqf Act: The Supreme Court proposed to stop some of the major provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 in an important development on Wednesday (16 April), including the power to involve non-obtained assets declared by the courts and to include non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Councils and Board.

The apex court proposed to pass the order, which the Center opposed and appealed for a detailed hearing before any interim order. The hearing related to 72 petitions against the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 was held before the bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice KV Vishwanathan.

Supreme Court asked questions from Soleitor General

The court bench will continue the hearing on Thursday (April 17). It expressed displeasure over the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Councils and Board and asked the Center if he was ready to include Muslims in Hindu religious trusts? After hearing the arguments of senior advocates including Kapil Sibal, Rajiv Dhawan, Abhishek Singhvi, CU Singh on behalf of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Muslim bodies and individual petitioners, the Chief Justice proposed to issue notice and pass an interim order and said that it will balance the equality.

It is mentioned that some provisions can have serious consequences, especially those who can weaken judicially recognized Waqf properties, the Chief Justice proposed the order. The bench said, “The properties declared as Waqf on behalf of the courts should not be non-defined as Waqf, whether they are Waqf on behalf of the user or Waqf on the deed, although the court is hearing a petition challenging the Waqf Amendment Act 2025.”

Indications to stop a provision of revised law

The bench also indicated to stop a provision of the revised law, stating that the vaqf property will not be considered as a waqf until the property is government land or not by the Collector. The bench looked at the provision-wise objections regarding the Act and expressed objections on several aspects of the law, including including non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf boards. In this, the District Collector also objected to the provisions allowing the right to settle disputes related to Waqf properties and to allow non-deferred assets to be declared by competent courts.

Speech on petitions filed against Waqf Amendment Act CJI

CJI Sanjeev Khanna said, “Usually, when a law is passed, courts do not interfere at the entry level, but the case may require exception. If the property declared by the user is unacceptable, it can have serious consequences.”

A sharp debate between back and Solicitor General

During the hearing, there was a sharp noise between the bench and the Solicitor General when the judges questioned the argument behind the permission of non-Muslims in the Waqf administration, while Hindu religious institutions do not apply equal mutuality.

The Law Officer said that in addition to ex-officio members in the Waqf Parishad, more than two non-Muslim members will not be included. He offered to say this in an affidavit. However, the bench said that out of 22 members of the Central Waqf Parishad under the new Act, only eight would be Muslims. The bench asked, “If there are eight Muslims, then there can be two judges who are not Muslims. This leads to a majority of non-Muslims. How is it compatible with the religious character of the institution?”

Questions raised on the fairness of a bench with Hindu judges

After this, the tension increased for some time when the Law Officer questioned the fairness of the bench with all Hindu judges. The bench said, “When we sit here, we give up our personal identity. For us, all sides are the same before the law. This comparison is completely wrong.” He asked why non-Hindus should not be included in the advisory board of Hindu temples again?

Court has not issued any formal notice yet

The court has not currently issued any formal notice and said that it will not consider banning the law in the current stage. The bench questioned Mehta as to how the “Waqf from the user” cannot be allowed, as many people would not have the required documents to register such Waqf. “Waqf” means “the user” is a practice in which a property in the form of religious or charitable settlement (Waqf) is given on the basis of long -term, uninterrupted use for its purposes, even if no formal, written announcement of Waqf has been made by the owner.

The amended provision said, “provided that the existing Waqf properties will remain in the form of Waqf property on the day of or before the implementation of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, except that the property is completely or partially in dispute or government property.”

The bench said, “How will you register such a user’s Waqf?” What documents will they have? This will make something undone. Yes, there is some misuse. But they are also real. I have also read the decisions of the Privy Council. The user’s Waqf is recognized. If you undo it, it will be a problem. The legislature cannot declare any decision, order or decree zero. You can only take Aadhaar. ”

Mehta, however, said that a large section of Muslims does not want to be ruled under the Waqf Act. The bench then asked Mehta, “Are you saying that from now on, you will allow Muslims to be a part of the Hindu Entrance Board?” Say it openly. ”

The Supreme Court said that when a public trust was declared a Waqf 100 or 200 years ago, it could not be taken under the Waqf Board and could not be declared otherwise. The bench said, “You cannot write the past again.” To this Mehta said that the Joint Parliamentary Committee held 38 meetings and investigated 98.2 lakh memorandum before its passage from both houses of Parliament.

CJI said at the beginning of the hearing, “There are two aspects on which we want to talk to both sides.” First of all, should we consider it or be handed over to the High Court? Second, briefly explain what you are really insisting and what you want to argue? We are not saying that there is any stay on the Supreme Court in hearing the petitions against the law and taking decisions.

Kapil Sibal said during the hearing

On behalf of the petitioners, senior advocate Kapil Sibal cited the Waqf Amendment Act and said that he is challenging the provision that only Muslims can wow. Sibal asked, “How can the government decide whether I am a Muslim or not and hence I am eligible to wake up?”

He said, “How can the government say that only those people who have been following Islam for the last five years?”

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, who represents some petitioners, said that the effect of the Waqf Act will be across India and the petitions should not be sent to the High Court. At the same time, opposing the Waqf Act, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi said that Waqf on behalf of the user is an established practice of Islam and it cannot be taken away.

72 petitions including AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), Congress MPs Imran Pratapgarhi and Mohammad Javed have been filed to challenge the validity of the Act.

Center filed a cavity

On April 8, the Center filed a ‘cavity’ in the Supreme Court and appealed for a hearing before passing any order in the case. To ensure that no order is passed by any party to ensure that no order is passed without hearing its side.

Supreme Court on Waqf Act: A bench of Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan heard the Waqf Act on Wednesday (16 April 2025). At present, the court has not given any order or instruction in this case. During the hearing, the court asked the Center whether Muslims would be allowed to be part of Hindu religious trusts?

‘Waqf by user can have serious consequences’

Senior advocates on behalf of the Solicitor General of the Central Government and the supporters of the Act assured the Supreme Court that the amendments made in the Waqf Act are completely constitutional and there is nothing to violate fundamental rights. During the hearing, the Supreme Court also told the Center that the abolition of Waqf by user can have serious consequences. However, the court said that it has also been misused.

How to register Waqf by user- Supreme Court

Questioning the removal of the provision of Waqf Bai user, the bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna asked that there was no arrangement of Waqf registration before the British rule. The court said, “A lot of mosques are made up of 13th, 14th, 15th century. You want you to show the sed deed, but where will they show.

You cannot write the past again- Supreme Court

Tushar Mehta said that a large section of Muslims does not want to be ruled under the Waqf Act. The bench then asked Mehta, “Are you saying that from now on, you will allow Muslims to be part of the Hindu Entrance Board.” Say it openly. ”The Supreme Court said that when a public trust was declared a Waqf 100 or 200 years ago, it could not be taken under the Waqf Board and could not be declared otherwise. The bench said, “You cannot write the past again.”

Also read: WAQF Act: ‘Will there be Muslims in Hindu board too, speak openly’, why did the Supreme Court refer to Tirumala Tirupati Balaji and asked SG Mehta?

Bihar News: Spiritual Guru Devkinandan Thakur has received a response to the violence against Waqf Amendment Act in West Bengal. During a conversation with the media in Buxar on Tuesday (April 14), he said, “Whether it is Akhilesh, Dinesh, whether there is any Mamta, no one is taking anyone’s name, I am just saying that the condition with which the fire has come from Bangladesh to Bengal, bean style is being tortured. The same fire will be the same if the fire will move slowly.”

Attacking politicians, he said, “Do not talk about Hindus, talk about castes. I believe that rise above castes, rise above chairs and keep a huge thinking. Try to save India.”

Thanks to PM Modi and Amit Shah

Devkinandan Thakur thanked PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for the Waqf law. Said, “Amit Shah fought the fight till 2 o’clock in the night. They have fought for the countrymen. There is no such law. There is no such law in the Muslim country. The property of poor poor widow Muslim women was also grabbed. This will not work in this country.”

Devkinandan Thakur said, “When King Bali had donated the entire universe to the Lord Vamana, then who are you going to donate to the Waqf Board? In two verses, Vamana God measured the whole universe, then the whole land was done by Vamana.

‘Buxar has different names in all four ages’

On the other hand, Devkinandan Thakur said about the importance of Buxar that it has different names in all four ages. Whether it is Siddhashram, whether it is a Vamana place, it has a different significance in every era. He said that Lord Shri Ram should have so much light that people from India and abroad keep coming here. The Bihar government should make an airport here.

Also read: Lalan Singh’s ultimatum to MLAs and ticket contenders before PM Modi’s visit to Bihar, ‘If in the meeting…’

Waqf amendment act: The Waqf Amendment Act has come into force in the entire country from today i.e. from April 8. Its notification has been issued by the Union Home Ministry. A total of 15 petitions have been filed against this law in the Supreme Court so far. The Central Government filed a cavity in the Supreme Court and requested to be heard before the order was passed on petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

Hearing will be held in Supreme Court next week

The Supreme Court will hear the Waqf Amendment Act on 15 April 2025. It has been repeatedly said by the central government that this law is about property and its management, not about religion. The BJP says that the Waqf Bill has been prepared after consulting the large section of the people and has also got the support of non-Muslim minorities. According to the Center, women and children could not benefit from Waqf property, while the revised law will get this benefit.

Which provision is the dispute?

The controversial provisions of the revised law compulsorily include two non-Muslim members in the Central Waqf Council and the Waqf Board. A bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna had assured Kapil Sibal, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind on 7 April 2025. President Draupadi Murmu approved the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 on 5 April, which was passed last week after a long discussion in both houses of Parliament.

Protesters burnt police car in Bengal

The protest against the new Waqf Act in Murshidabad in West Bengal turned into violence. Initially, the police asked the protesters to protest at one place, but suddenly the protesters started going ahead of the place mentioned. During this time, a scuffle with the police started. The protesters blocked the road and set the police on fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0ppdnidx3o

The notification of the Ministry of Minority Affairs said, “The Central Government has implemented the provisions of the said Act since April 8, 2025 using the powers provided by sub-stream (2) of Section 1 of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.” Protests are also being done in many states of the country against the Waqf Amendment Act. Told against

Jamaat-e-Islami Hind told law anti-Muslim

According to the news agency IANS, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Vice President Malik Mutim Khan said, “The amendment in the Waqf Act is against the country’s Constitution. I believe that Parliament has the right to enact a law, but any law should be made within the scope of the constitution. I will consider the Waqf Law illegal and we will take the door of the court.”

Waqf amendment act: The Central Government has issued a notification regarding the Waqf Amendment Act. The Center has informed that the new Waqf law will be applicable today i.e. Wednesday 8 April 2025. President Draupadi Murmu approved on Saturday (April 5) after the Waqf Amendment Bill passed from both houses of Parliament.

Protests are taking place in many states

While protests are taking place in many states of the country against the new Waqf law, the Congress, AIMIM and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) have challenged in the Supreme Court with different petitions. According to the central government, this law is not anti -Muslim and its purpose is to prevent bias, misuse of Waqf properties. There were 288 votes in favor of the Waqf Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha and 232 votes in the opposition. At the same time, there were 128 votes in favor of the bill in Rajya Sabha and 95 votes in opposition.

So far 15 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court

A total of 15 petitions have been filed against this law in the Supreme Court so far. At the same time, the Central Government filed a cavity to avoid the possibility of unilateral order. Demonstrations are being organized against Waqf Amendment Act in many states of the country including Manipur, West Bengal, Patna.

Jamaat-e-Islami Hind has opened a front against the central government regarding the Waqf law. Jamaat-e-Islami Hind President Syed Sadatullah Hussaini said, “Waqf law is against the Muslims of the country. I think this law does not help in improving the administration of Waqf.”

Jamaat-e-Islami Hind targeted the center

He said, “The government says that this law will improve, but we believe that there will be further problems. The provisions that further spoil the administration, increase corruption and snatch the rights of Muslims have been included in this law.”

Also read:- Donald Trump’s house will come to good news this month, Nana will become US President for 11th time, youngest daughter Tiffni pregnant

Pakistan on Waqf amendment bill: Recently, the Waqf Amendment Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha, which has now taken the form of the law after the President’s approval. The purpose of this law is to digitize Waqf properties, ban illegal encroachments and to fix accountability of Waqf boards.

This bill was in controversies in India, but more interesting response has come from Pakistan. Qamar Cheema, who is generally criticized for Indian policies, is considered to be Pakistan’s leading political analyst and security affairs experts, he publicly appreciated this law. He said that India’s decision regarding Waqf is correct. Qamar Cheema further said that as an example, people keep the dargah illegally occupied, so it is necessary to control such things. Such a situation is also in Pakistan, where people occupy mosques. I think the dargah people think that we should do our own work. The people of the dargah live in Pakistan and do corruption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw43cnfg8cs

Qamar Cheema supported the government
Qamar Cheema said that what the Modi government is doing is not wrong. He said that digitization of Waqf properties is an essential and positive step. The provisions that have been brought to prevent illegal encroachment are necessary. Transparency is necessary in the operation of mosques and dargahs so that their misuse can be stopped. He also said that the Muslim community itself should come forward and support these reforms as it is in the long -term interest of the society. He said that everyone should focus on reforms. My question is if the Waqf people are unable to improve for so many days, then whose mistake is. Therefore, reform is necessary.

Waqf mafia and corruption
Qamar Cheema also justified the word ‘Waqf Mafia’. He believed that 50,000 Waqf properties are going on in India, which is shocking. All these lands are inside UP. Many people of these institutions run their own arbitrary and want to avoid government monitoring. Waqf institutions are not ready for their internal reforms, due to which their purpose is becoming deformed. Giving the example of Pakistan, he said that all the efforts are made to protect religious institutions from government monitoring there so that economic transparency can be avoided.