Justice Yashwant Verma has reprimanded the petitioner who reached the Supreme Court seeking to register an FIR in the cash case. The petitioner repeatedly called Justice Yashwant Verma as ‘Verma’. Annoyed by this, Chief Justice BR Gavai said, ‘He is not your friend. Do not forget that he is still an honorable judge of the High Court. His name cannot be taken in this way.

Advocate Mathews Nedumpra had earlier filed a petition for an FIR against Justice Verma 2 times. For the first time, the Supreme Court said that the Chief Justice has formed an in -house committee of 3 judges for investigation. Then for the second time he said that the report of the committee has been sent to the President and the Prime Minister.

Request for early hearing from Chief Justice BR Gawai

Nedumpra, who reached the Supreme Court for the third time, requested Chief Justice BR Gavai to hear soon. Nedumpra said, ‘Verma himself has created such a situation that FIR is necessary.’ Chief Justice BR Gawai was enraged at this.

He said, ‘How are you addressing them? He is still Justice Verma. On this, Nedumpra said that in his eyes, Justice Verma is not worthy of such respect. The Chief Justice refused to put the case immediately and said, “Do not teach the court right and wrong.”

Petition filed in Supreme Court

Let us know that last week, Justice Yashwant Verma has approached the Supreme Court and filed a petition against the committee’s decision. In the petition, Justice Verma has said that the committee did not give him a proper opportunity to present his case. Worked on the basis of predetermined thinking and gave his conclusion. There was a need to investigate whose cash it was? But instead of conducting proper investigation, the committee asked him to prove that the cash is not their.

Justice yashwant varma case: The Supreme Court will hear on Friday (March 28, 2025) on the petition filed against Justice Yashwant Verma. The case is in the bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Ujjwal Bhuiyan. 4 petitioners from Mumbai have said that getting a large amount of money at the judge’s house is a criminal case. For this, instead of creating an investigation committee of 3 judges, other agencies including police should have asked for investigation.

The petition by lawyer Mathews Nedmara, Hemali Kurne, Rajesh Adrekar and Chartered Accountant Manisha Mehta has also opposed the Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench’s decision in the 1991 case. It was said in that decision that the consent of the Chief Justice of India before the FIR against the High Court or Supreme Court judge is necessary. The petitioners have said that only the President and the governors have been exempted from the trial in the constitution. With its decision, the Supreme Court gave the judges separate special status from the common citizens.

Petitioners made them party

The petitioners have also made the party along with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, the Central Government, Delhi Police, Delhi Fire Department, ED, CBI and Income Tax Department. Apart from this, Justice Sheel Nagu, Justice GS Sandhavalia and Justice Anu Shivraman, members of the 3 -member inquiry committee constituted by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, have also been made side.

‘Treatment should be done like ordinary citizens with judges’

It has been said in the petition that the FIR should have been lodged immediately after receiving the burnt cash in the judge’s house on March 14 and the arrest should have been made but now the case has been handed over to the judges’ investigation committee, which is not correct. Just as an FIR is registered against common citizens in a criminal case, it should be done in this case as well. The Supreme Court cancels the comments made in the Veeraswami verdict of 1991 and register a case to the investigating agencies and ask them to investigate.

The petition claimed that due to giving separate status to the judges, he has survived the FIR even in serious cases like Poxo. These petitioners associated with an organization called National Liars Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms have reminded that Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill was introduced in Parliament in 2010 to investigate the corruption of judges and other wrong conduct, but that law could not be made.

Also read: ‘Justice Yashwant Verma will consider action on action’, meeting the collegium with High Court Bar Association

Fir against judge: The case of Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Verma is currently hot in the country. When Chief Justice DK Upadhyay submitted a report of fire in the house of Judge Yashwant Verma to CJI Sanjeev Khanna, it mentioned the currency getting a currency from his house in a half -conditioned condition. However, Justice Verma rejected the matter of getting the money and said that he was not aware that there was cash in his storeroom. He directly said that we were neither shown nor handed over a sack of burnt posture. However, this is not the first time that a judge is accused of corruption. Let us tell you that for the first time an FIR was registered against which judge of the High Court.

SN Shukla was accused of corruption

During the Allahabad High Court judge, the CBI registered a case of corruption against Justice SN Shukla in December 2019. He was accused that he had helped by passing a favorable order to a medical college in Lucknow for money. In such a situation, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Ranjan Gogoi, had allowed the CBI to register a case under the Prevention of Karps Act against SN Shukla of the High Court. This was the first time in history that the Supreme Court had allowed the CBI to register a case regarding the High Court judge.

What is the whole matter

Actually, this whole matter is related to Prasad Institute of Medical Sciences on Kanpur Road. This is of SP leaders BP Yadav and Palash Yadav. When the Medical Council of India visited here in the year 2017, it was found that basic facilities are not good. There was no complete standard for medical studies. After this, the order was received that 46 medical colleges of the country including Prasad Institute should be banned from not meeting the standards, and the ban was imposed.

Justice SN Shukla’s bench gave the decision

After this, the Prasad Institute approached the Supreme Court, but the bench of the then Chief Justice Deepak Mishra did not give relief to the medical colleges. He then filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court. It was heard by the bench of Justice SN Shukla. Justice SN Shukla allowed Prasad Institute to take new admissions. After this, there was a stir in the rest of the medical colleges and the control of Justice SN Shukla started tight.

Arrest warrant against judges: Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Verma has been in the headlines for the last several days. A few days ago a large amount of cash was recovered from his house. After this, the Supreme Court has ordered him to transfer Allahabad High Court. At the same time, the roster of Delhi High Court is also being talked about removing his name. But do you know that once the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly issued a warrant for the arrest of judges. There was a lot of uproar at that time.

MLA Narasimha Narayan was accused of corruption

This is done during the third term of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly. Socialist Party activist Keshav Singh had pasted posters from Gorakhpur to the corridors of Vidhan Bhavan, in which Congress MLA Narasimha Narayan Pandey was accused of corruption. The MLA considered it a violation of privilege. At that time, the assembly speaker was Madan Mohan Verma, then the MLA pleaded in front of him and the matter went to the privilege committee. The committee then held four people including Keshav Singh guilty and they were asked to appear in the House. The rest of the people appeared in the House, but Keshav Singh did not come. Keshav Singh said that he does not have money to come from Gorakhpur to House.

When Keshav Singh arrested

He may not appear in the House, but he sent a letter to the speaker and wrote in it that the decision to summon him in the House is Nadirshahi. Now the then Chief Minister was Sucheta Kripalani, so he made a direct proposal in the House that Keshav Singh should be arrested and sent to jail for seven days. Marshal from Gorakhpur arrested Keshav Singh and sent him to jail. Then advocate b. On 19 March 1964, Soleman called this arrest wrong before the Allahabad High Court and even filed a petition. Keshav Singh had passed six days in jail. When the day of hearing came, no lawyer appeared on behalf of the government. In such a situation, Keshav Singh got bail.

Warrant came out of UP assembly for arrest of judges

Assembly speakers became enraged about this. He considered this decision as an intervention in the authority of the Legislative Assembly and with both the High Court judges Naseerullah Baig and GD Sehgal, lawyer B.K. Soleman was arrested and issued a warrant to be presented in the House. Now both the judges are worried about what to do. Then he filed a petition against this order in his own High Court. Later, the matter was heard by the Supreme Court.

Yashwant Verma News: The case of Justice Yashwant Verma of Delhi High Court has caught fire. The Supreme Court has transferred him to the Allahabad High Court. Now this decision of the Supreme Court has been clearly opposed by the Allahabad High Court Bar Association.

The High Court Bar Association will start protests from gate number 3 of the High Court from 10:00 am. The High Court Bar has announced a fight to cross. Bar president Anil Tiwari said that the High Court Bar Association will take to the streets and protest.

Bar Association President Senior Advocate Anil Tiwari has demanded intervention from the central government in the case. It was decided to go on strike after the executive meeting held at the residence of Bar Association President Anil Tiwari. He has demanded a reconsideration of the CJI’s decision to transfer the case by taking cognizance of the case. All the members were present in the emergency meeting of the executive.

Allahabad High Court will not have hearing from tomorrow! Lawyers will be on indefinite strike, know why?

What did Anil Tiwari say?
Anil Tiwari said in a strict tone that it has come that we have to show the mirror to the Supreme Court that you are not different from us. Today, if the Supreme Court has taken this view on this issue, then tomorrow the Supreme Court will overcome the entire government like Pakistan and form the government itself.

He said that in this case, a smuggling is being done from the beginning. I want to tell the whole of India that we will not work from tomorrow. We are standing in the chest. If we have to die to save the judiciary, then we will give. Now the work in the judiciary will be done only when the decision to transfer the Supreme Court, Justice Yashwant Verma will be returned.

He said that the Supreme Court is paramount but it is insistence on children. To save a judge, the democracy of the entire Hindustan is being put at stake. There is an appeal to our government to intervene in this matter and find a solution together.

The general secretary said- Is it appropriate to send accused of corruption to Allahabad?
Speaking to ABP News, Vikrant Pandey, general secretary of the High Court Bar Association, said that we had called the General House. In this, the proposal was passed that if Justice Verma would be sent here then it will not be appropriate. After our proposal, news came that the Supreme Court has approved the transfer of Yashwant Verma. We will demand from the government to intervene in this matter. Our only question is whether the judge accused of corruption will be kept in the Allahabad High Court, not Delhi? The Supreme Court has tried to prove this today.

Pandey said that we have got support from all sections of society. We have taken the decision of an indefinite strike under compulsion. After all, why here? After all, they will remain there and will stay there too. You would let them stay in Delhi. You are sending them to the parent High Court and rewarding them. We will not work at all. We are not going to retreat on the issue of corruption.

Jagdeep dhankar praise cji sanjiv khanna: Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar has given a statement in the case of burnt notes found in the house of Justice Yashwant Verma of Delhi High Court. He said that the Supreme Curt has taken steps in the right direction, the first thing has happened after independence that the Chief Justice has placed all the material in the universal domain. The Chairman gave this statement after meeting the House Leader JP Nadda and the Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge.

He said that there is a need to end such unhealthy so that such situations do not come again. The Rajya Sabha president described the judiciary’s internal response as ‘step taken in the right direction’. Jagdeep Dhankhar said, ‘I am grateful to the leader of the House Nadda and the Leader of the Opposition Kharge. We had a meaningful discussion on the issue arising in the minds of the judiciary. For the first time after independence, a Chief Justice has kept all the material available in a public domain in a transparent and accountable manner and shared it without hiding anything with the court.

‘Steps taken in a right direction’

The President of the Rajya Sabha further said, ‘This is a step taken in the right direction. The formation of a committee on behalf of the Chief Justice of India and their vigilance is also a factor that needs to be considered. Institutions like the judiciary and the legislature fulfill their objectives in the best way when their internal mechanism is effective, fast and maintaining public confidence.

‘Action initiated in impressive and transparent manner’

He said, ‘Since this is the first time that the Chief Justice of the judiciary Sanjeev Khanna has initiated action in a very impressive, transparent manner, it would be appropriate to wait for the results of the committee as it will help us to get full material for our thoughts. There was a very thoughtful suggestion from Kharge that in accordance with the parliamentary tradition, the issue should be discussed with the leaders of the House and finding the suggestion appropriate, as well as a meeting will be scheduled after the full approval of the three of us, in which I will invite the leaders of the House to decide on this. ‘

‘CJI Sanjeev Khanna takes unprecedented steps’

Jagdeep Dhankhar said, ‘I have strongly indicated that if we look at the previous performance, these steps taken by Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna are unprecedented and what can be needed in such a challenging situation, which is agitating the members of the judiciary, members of the bar, MPs and general public, through its investigation, there will

He also said, ‘I will determine a meeting in this regard and send information according to the suggested suggestions of Kharge and Nadda. I am grateful to their deep understanding because both of them are with rich experiences, being president of their respective political parties and holding constitutional positions, it is believed that institutions in the country should be developed only with honesty and public commitment and need to end such evil practices so that it does not recur. I am grateful to both of them that they gave time on this issue with the spirit of keeping the nation ahead of everything.

Also read: Will Justice Verma not do any judicial work in Allahabad HC? Collegium recommends transfer from center

Lucknow News: Samajwadi Party national president and former Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav has reacted to the incident of getting cash at the residence of Delhi High Court Judge Yashwant Verma. SP Chief Akhilesh Yadav said on this matter, “He may have borrowed that money (Yashwant Verma), it has been caught a few money. We saw several hundred crores of paise in Uttarakhand but till date it is not known whose money it is.”

Along with this, SP Chief Akhilesh Yadav said on Mahakumbh- “The devotees who have died or lost in a holy holy event like Mahakumbh, neither do the government want to give compensation nor do they want to find them. The path of truth and religion is of eternal but they (the state government) are lying on the death of devotees or being lost. Where have drones and CCTV gone? “

At the same time, Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Verma described the allegations of cash scandal as completely baseless and said that it is a conspiracy to defame and implicate him. Along with this, a detailed reply has been sent to the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court on these allegations. At the same time, Chief Justice of Supreme Court Sanjeev Khanna has formed a 3 -judge committee to investigate the allegations against Justice Yashwant Verma of Delhi High Court.

At the same time, Justice Yashwant Verma has said on the allegation of getting cash at the government residence that neither I nor the family got any cash, there is an attempt to implicate it under the conspiracy. Along with this, he has said that the room in which the money is being said to get money was completely different from my main residence.

Meerut Saurabh murder case: Mother is going to be a killer smile? Pregnancy test may be in jail

Action on judge yashwant verma: Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna has formed a committee of 3 judges to investigate the allegations against Delhi High Court Justice Yashwant Verma. The members of this committee are Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Sheel Nagu, Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice GS Sandhavalia and Karnataka High Court Judge Anu Shivraman.

Justice Yashwant Verma will not be able to do judicial work

This information has been given in the press release issued by the Supreme Court. According to the release, the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court has been asked not to give any judicial work to Justice Yashwant Verma at the moment. In the press release issued by the Supreme Court, it has also been told that the report of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, the reply of Justice Yashwant Verma and other documents are being uploaded on the Supreme Court website regarding this matter.

Supreme Court constituted investigation committee

Justice Yashwant Verma is in controversies about the news of a huge amount of cash being received at his house. Now the Supreme Court has formed a formal inquiry committee. The formation of the investigation committee is the first phase of the process of removing a judge from the post. If the investigation committee finds the allegations against the judge correct, its report is sent to the Parliament, where a proposal to remove the judge is brought.

Recently, there was a fire at the house of Justice Yashwant Verma. At that time the judges were not present at the house. The family informed the fire brigade and the police. After extinguishing the fire, while taking stock of the damage, the employees found a large amount of cash in a room. This information reached the top police officers. He further conveyed this information to the Union Home Ministry.

Also read: ‘Only Hindus should work in Tirumala’, CM Naidu spoke on the transapper of 18 employees from Tirupati temple