By Admin 
Back Foot No Ball ICC Rule: Ravi Bishnoi is being considered a major reason for Team India’s defeat in the second T20 against England. Bishnoi spent 29 runs in the 17th over, which changed the course of the entire match. During this, he bowled two ‘back-foot no-balls’. A no ball in which Indian spinner Ravi Bishnoi’s leg did not go beyond the line, but still it was declared a no ball. So let us know what is the rule of International Cricket Council (ICC) regarding this no ball, due to which Team India lost.
Back foot no ball, what does ICC rule say?
You must have seen that when a bowler’s front foot falls out of the crease, that ball is called a no ball. One free hit ball is available on this ball. Similarly, when the bowler’s foot falls outside the side line of the crease, it is called backfoot no ball.
The way Bishnoi bowls at an angle, the problem of back foot no ball can arise with such bowlers. However, back foot no balls have been rarely seen from spinners. Fast bowlers sometimes bowl back foot no balls.
According to ICC rules, just as the batsman gets a free hit on any other no ball, similarly he gets a free hit on a backfoot no ball. Let us tell you that Bishnoi bowled 3 back foot no balls in the match.
Bishnoi’s over turned the outcome of the match
England needed 49 runs to win in the last 4 overs. Ravi Bishnoi, who came in the 17th over, spent 29 runs. From here the English team needed 20 runs in 3 overs. The team won the match in 19 overs by scoring 20 runs in just 2 overs. In this way Bishnoi’s over became very costly for the team.
Also read: Jacob Bethel, who single-handedly defeated Team India, gave a big statement on England’s victory, know what he said