By Admin 
Supreme Court News: The Supreme Court reprimanded a couple entangled in a matrimonial dispute. The court said that they should not behave like a Maharaja, because democracy has been maintained in the country for more than 75 years. This comment of the Supreme Court was on the party included in the couple, which is allegedly from the royal royal family. While investigating the case, the court found that there was a collision of ego between the two sides. A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh asked the couple’s lawyers to talk to their clients and tell their intention to the court.
What allegations did the woman make in the petition?
The woman has alleged that her husband and in -laws living separately harassed her for demanding a flat in dowry and a flat in Mumbai. However, her husband has denied the allegation. The petition filed by the woman said that when their demands were not met, they started refusing to accept the marriage and started making false and trivial allegations against the petitioner and started violating her character. The husband filed a case of fraud and forgery in preparing a marriage certificate against the wife, his parents and relatives living separately, while the woman filed a case of dowry harassment and cruelty.
The bench said, “Such statements are being made that the attempt for mediation has failed? Do not behave like a king-emperor. 75 years have passed since the establishment of democracy.”
The court warned that if there was no solution through arbitration, it will give strict orders within three days. The woman from Gwalior claimed that she belongs to the prestigious family, whose ancestor Chhatrapati was admiral in the Navy of Shivaji Maharaj and was declared the ruler of the Konkan region. On the other hand, her husband said that he comes from a military family and runs a school in Madhya Pradesh.
Rolls Royce car is the root of controversy
The root of the controversy in the case is the Rolls Royce car of the 1951 model. The price of which is more than Rs 2.5 crore. This car was built by the first Prime Minister of India by Jawaharlal Nehru for the Queen of Baroda, who is the only car in his model. Apart from this, the lawyers presented by both sides told the court that the dispute is also about money.
Justice Kant said, “We know that in the case only the compromise has not been reached due to ego. If the dispute is about money, it can resolve the court, but for this the parties will have to reach the consensus.” The court set the hearing for the next week. On April 22, senior advocate R Basant, appointed on 22 April, was informed that both sides could not be reached in the case. He requested the court to give a final effort to find the possibility of a mutual consent solution between the two sides.
Also read- Former Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid’s big statement on India-Pakistan ceasefire, ‘Prime Minister …’