<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>my girl sister plan Archives -</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fastnewsglobe.com/tag/my-girl-sister-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fastnewsglobe.com/tag/my-girl-sister-plan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Jayant Patil raised questions on &#8216;Majhi Ladki Bahin&#8217; scheme, said- If 80 lakhs were ineligible then why were benefits given for 20 months?</title>
		<link>https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/</link>
					<comments>https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lastest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80 lakh women found ineligible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jayant Patil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ladki Bahin Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my girl sister plan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Political controversy has intensified after about 80 lakh women were found ineligible during the verification...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/">Jayant Patil raised questions on &#8216;Majhi Ladki Bahin&#8217; scheme, said- If 80 lakhs were ineligible then why were benefits given for 20 months?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fastnewsglobe.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<div id="article-hstick-inner"> <!-- AI bullet --> <!-- end AI bullet -->  </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Political controversy has intensified after about 80 lakh women were found ineligible during the verification process in the Maharashtra government&#8217;s flagship welfare scheme &#8216;Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin&#8217;. Senior leader of Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar faction) Jayant Patil on Tuesday launched a scathing attack on the government and demanded accountability.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">Why benefits to fake beneficiaries for 20 months?</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Jayant Patil raised the question that, if 80 lakh beneficiaries in this scheme were fake, then why did the government give them the benefits of the scheme for the last 20 months? Expressing doubt he asked – was this planned corruption? Patil further said &#8211; At the rate of Rs 1,500 per woman per month, approximately Rs 24,000 crore was distributed to these 80 lakh ineligible women. The government should tell who is responsible for this huge amount? </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Good news for the farmers of Maharashtra! Fadnavis government approves loan waiver up to Rs 2 lakh</strong></p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">A game played for electoral gain?</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The former minister alleged that the government did not make any concrete verification system while starting the scheme. He also raised the question whether this scheme was implemented without investigation for electoral gains. Jayant Patil demanded that the government fix responsibility for this lapse and clarify how such a large number of beneficiaries were suddenly found ineligible.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">government defense</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the other hand, Maharashtra government has clarified that the scheme will not be stopped. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that even after verification, 1.70 crore eligible women will continue to benefit from the scheme. The government claims that the ineligible ones have been removed after the completion of the e-KYC process. Whereas opposition parties have termed it as “negligence and corruption”.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bulldozer runs on illegal dargah in Aarey, Mumbai, allegation of encroachment on 70 thousand square feet government land</strong></p>
<p> <!-- input--> </div>
<p><a href="https://www.abplive.com/states/maharashtra/maharashtra-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-80-lakh-women-found-ineligible-jayant-patil-slams-govt-3139149" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Source link </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/">Jayant Patil raised questions on &#8216;Majhi Ladki Bahin&#8217; scheme, said- If 80 lakhs were ineligible then why were benefits given for 20 months?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fastnewsglobe.com"></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fastnewsglobe.com/jayant-patil-raised-questions-on-majhi-ladki-bahin-scheme-said-if-80-lakhs-were-ineligible-then-why-were-benefits-given-for-20-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
