The Supreme Court has given a big blow to Kuldeep Singh Sengar, who was convicted in the Unnao gangrape case and expelled from BJP. The Supreme Court has stayed the order of the Delhi High Court, in which Sengar’s life imprisonment was suspended.

Stay on Delhi High Court order
The Supreme Court stayed the decision of the Delhi High Court, in which the life sentence of Kuldeep Sengar was suspended in the Unnao rape case involving a minor victim. The court also made it clear that Sengar is already in jail in another case and the High Court order will have no effect now.

Supreme Court notice on CBI petition
Supreme Court has issued notice to Kuldeep Sengar on the appeal of CBI. The court has given time to the opposition to file the counter affidavit and has clearly said that Sengar will not be released from jail under any circumstances till the next hearing.

First reaction of the victim’s lawyer
The victim’s lawyer Hemant Kumar Maurya has welcomed the order of the Supreme Court. He said, ‘I want to thank the Supreme Court today. The victim is also grateful for this decision of the court. The Supreme Court has given a clear order to the lower courts that the accused will not be released from jail under any circumstances. The order of the High Court has been put on hold.

The victim will get justice – Congress
Congress leader Mumtaz Patel, reacting to the Supreme Court’s decision, said that now the hope of getting justice for the Unnao victim has strengthened. He said, ‘Kuldeep Sengar should get death penalty. Strict laws should be made for crimes like rape, so that such crimes can be stopped.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath gave a big statement today on the occasion of the anniversary of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya. He said that today is a very special day because on this day the disputed structure was removed.

In fact, in a program he was asked that the slogan given is ‘Now it’s Ayodhya’s turn, Kashi Mathura is left’, is it Mathura’s turn now? So in response to this, CM Yogi said that we will reach everywhere and have already reached.

In a special program of HT, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath said that any society should be proud of its heritage. Thanking the Supreme Court for the construction of Shri Ram temple in Ayodhya, CM Yogi said that everyone accepted that decision and today is a particularly important day. That controversial structure was removed on this very day. A stigma was removed and a heritage was restored.

Thanks to the Supreme Court

CM Yogi thanked the Supreme Court for the construction of Ram Temple and said that we are thankful to the Supreme Court, which unanimously reviewed the facts and evidence presented and gave the verdict. This is the biggest victory of Indian democracy that everyone accepted this decision of the Supreme Court. He said that whatever may be the reason, this campaign will become an example for the development of the country for the coming generations.

A new debate may arise

Regarding Kashi-Mathura, CM Yogi said that ‘will reach and has reached’. Can start a new debate in the country’s politics. The case of both the disputed sites of Varanasi and Mathura is in the court. Such an interpretation has exposed the vision of the BJP and the Sangh within it.

The Supreme Court has ordered to remove stray dogs from public places, schools and hospitals and shift them to shelter homes, on which Prateek, younger son of Mulayam Singh Yadav and husband of BJP leader Aparna Yadav, has reacted sharply. He described this decision as extremely cruel and beyond humanity.

Prateek Yadav appealed to the people to withdraw this decision, before which the Supreme Court had to reverse its decision last time. He said that before giving any decision regarding dogs, research should have been done on how dogs live? If these dogs are shifted to a new place then they will die.

Called the Supreme Court’s decision cruel

Prateek Yadav has reacted to the Supreme Court’s decision by releasing a video. In this he looks ill and is admitted in the hospital. Prateek said that “Today again a decision has come from the Supreme Court regarding stray dogs, which has been given by Judges Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjariya and this is not an honorable decision.”

He said that the Supreme Court is always addressed as honorable but this decision is not honorable. Because, again they have given a very wrong decision. They have decided that stray dogs should be picked up from all the high end locations, neutered and either put in a shelter or if there is no shelter then they should be left alone in some local area.

‘Do some research before giving decision’

As I have told that dogs are territorial animals, in whatever area you release them, there is a pack of existing dogs there, wherever you search on Google that these dogs live in a pack, there is a pack of them, if they see any outside dog in their place, they will run and kill them.

This decision is once again against humanity, it is a cruel decision and it is a decision about which they did not even think anything. They should do a little research on how dogs live. You neutralize them but leave them where you picked them up. If you leave them at a new place, their death is certain.

He appealed that you please share my voice to those people and get this decision reversed, just like the previous decision was reversed.

PM Modi gave a gift to Varanasi, got another Vande Bharat train, will run on Banaras-Khajuraho route

There is a ruckus in the country over the new Waqf law. Muslim organizations are opposing this law and demonstrations continue. The matter has reached the Supreme Court, which is likely to be heard soon. In such a situation, the question is that if the Supreme Court cancels the new Waqf Act illegal, can the Supreme Court’s decision be reversed? Today we will introduce you to those matters recorded in history, in which the government brought an ordinance and overturned till the Supreme Court’s decision. Let’s know about such cases …

Reservation case

The first case of overturning by bringing an ordinance to the Supreme Court’s decision came up in 1961. The Supreme Court had ruled in a case of reservation that the government cannot keep seats in educational institutions on the basis of religion or caste. The Constitution was amended in 1961 against this decision. Claus (4) was added to Article 15, under which the government had empowered to reserve seats for candidates of backward castes in educational institutions.

Indira Gandhi case

The second major case of overturning the Supreme Court’s decision through the Constitution amendment is related to former Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi. In 1971, the election of Indira Gandhi from Rae Bareli was challenged in the Allahabad High Court. In her judgment, the court found Indira Gandhi guilty of rigging in the election and her election was canceled. The government brought the 39th amendment against this decision and Article 392A was added, which said that the election of the President, Vice President, Prime Minister and Lok Sabha speaker cannot be challenged in any court. Later the matter reached the Supreme Court, where the 39th amendment was declared illegal.

Shah Bano episode

Shah Bano, a resident of Indore, was divorced by her husband Muhammad Ali Khan, after which Shah Bano reached the Supreme Court to demand alimony. In 1985, the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 125 of CRPC, divorced Muslim women are entitled to receive alimony. In 1986, the government introduced the Muslim women actor 1986. Under this, Muslim women are not entitled to receive alimony. Divorced Muslim women are entitled to alimony till the completion of the three -month period of Iddat.

Case of transfer-posting of Delhi administrative officials

This matter related to the sharing of the powers of the Delhi government was very much discussed. On May 11, 2023, the Supreme Court ordered that the Delhi government has authority over the bureaucracy in Delhi and the government can transfer the officers. The government came with an ordinance against this decision of the Supreme Court, in which the right to transfer Delhi officials was given to the Lieutenant Governor.

Also read: What is ‘Hindu phobia’, against which the government of this country going to make laws