Train Night Traveling Rules: Crores of people travel by train every day in India. Someone leaves for office work. So someone returns home or goes for a walk. From crowded general coaches to comfortable AC coaches. There are long queues of passengers in every class. Indian Railways runs thousands of trains daily.

Which connects every corner of the country. But if you travel by train at night. So some small mistakes can prove costly. These mistakes not only cause trouble to others. In fact, you may also be fined under railway rules. Therefore, it is important to keep these things in mind before travelling. Let us tell you the complete information.

Playing songs on speaker or shouting on calls

People often do not know about some common mistakes while traveling by train at night. Because of which they have to face problems. The most common mistake is to play loud songs or watch videos on your mobile speaker while traveling in a train. Doing this at night can disturb the comfort of other passengers. Under the Railway Act, if any passenger disturbs others.

Also read: If IRCTC cancels your ticket on its own, does it still charge cancellation charges? know the rules

So if a complaint is received, a fine can be imposed on him. If you want to listen to music then use earbuds. Similarly, talking loudly on a call or keeping the speakerphone on can also cause problems. Therefore definitely avoid these mistakes.

keep coach lights on at night

Often passengers keep the main lights of the coach on to read or talk at night. But railway rules say that only night lights can be kept on at night. It is the responsibility of every passenger to switch off the remaining lights so that the sleep of others is not disturbed. If a passenger complains that he is facing problems because of you. So railway officials can take action. Many times he is let off with a warning. But for doing this repeatedly, fine can also be imposed.

Also read: Pink Saheli smart card will be made for these people along with women, they will be able to travel in the bus for free.

making noise or talking loudly in a group

If you are traveling at night, it is important to maintain peace. While talking to friends or family, people often raise their voice or start playing games. Due to which others face problems. Many times passengers complain about such activities to TTE or Railway Police. If you do this even after warning. Then a fine can be imposed on him.

Also read: If the train is late by more than 3 hours then you can get full refund like this, see the complete process step by step.

Delhi’s Patiala House Court has given a big blow to lawyer Mahmood Pracha by rejecting his petition in which he had demanded to declare the Supreme Court’s 2019 Ayodhya verdict nullified. The court has imposed a fine of Rs 6 lakh on the lawyer, terming the petition as ‘frivolous’, misleading and an abuse of the judicial process.

District Judge Dharmendra Rana said in his order that the petition filed by Mahmood Pracha is not only beyond the facts but it also raises questions on the credibility of the judicial system. The court said that it appears that the petitioner did not read the Ayodhya verdict completely, otherwise such confusion would not have arisen. The court admitted that this case was filed only for the purpose of creating publicity and spreading misunderstanding.

Lawyer misinterpreted Justice Chandrachud’s speech

In the petition, Pracha had claimed that the then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud had said in a speech that the Ayodhya verdict was based on the solution given by Lord Shri Ram Lala. On this, the court clarified that Justice Chandrachud had only said that he had prayed to God for guidance and not received any solution from any party. The court said that the lawyer filed the case without understanding the difference between God and juristic personality i.e. a legally recognized deity.

Court expressed displeasure and gave strict warning

Making a strong comment, the court said that when the protectors become the predators, then the situation becomes worrying. The court said that such negligence cannot be expected from a senior lawyer. The court also added that it is necessary to take strict action against such baseless cases so that the time and resources of the judicial system are not wasted.

Reference to Judge Protection Act

Patiala House Court clearly said in its decision that this case is a bar under the ‘Judges Protection Act, 1985’. According to this Act, no civil or criminal action can be taken against any judge for judicial work. Upholding the order of the lower court, the court increased the amount of fine from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 6 lakh and said that it is everyone’s responsibility to maintain the dignity and sanctity of the judiciary.